Banks with foreign capital, taking market share in almost 50%, up to 2009 suffered a loss of $ 1.3 billion poorer results showed only banks with the interim administration.
In 2009, foreign banking groups have stopped buying up domestic banks and focused on the financial support of existing assets.
Big changes
   ÂÂ
Recall: in 2005-2008. Foreign investors have bought up dozens of Ukrainian banks for quite a fabulous price at a cost target of more than $ 12 billion, however, instead of profit and the seizure of more and more market share last year, banks are “foreigners” and their eminent owners were forced to take care of banal survival. The paradox is that they have become hostages of their own aggressive policies. As you know, the majority of foreign owners, owning a bank in Ukraine, sought to whatever was to drastically increase its market position.
For this Ukrainian “daughters” were supplied with cheap funding environment in the foreign currency they had only to issue loans to end borrowers. As a result, about 80% of the loan portfolio of banks with foreign capital was denominated in foreign currency, whereas in the whole banking sector this figure barely exceeded 50%. It is not surprising that the “foreigners” most affected by arrears due to the steep devaluation of the currency.
Thus, for 11 months in 2009 loss of Raiffeisen Bank Aval was 1.6 billion UAH., UkrSibbank - 1,2 billion UAH. “OTP Bank - 0.9 billion UAH. The greatest loss of financial establishments with foreign participation demonstrated Swedbank. According to the Association of Ukrainian Banks (AUB; Kiev, in 1990, about 130 members), the negative financial result of the bank on December 1, 2009 reached 2.6 billion UAH. This is more of the authorized capital of the financial institution on that date. Thus, the balance capital Swedbank was negative (-37.8 million UAH.).
A similar pattern is observed only in the most desperate banks with the interim administration of NBU. Must be emphasized that the loss of Swedbank has increased dramatically in just two months (October-November 2009). On October 1, this figure was less than 1 billion UAH. It is noteworthy that in October, was attached to Swedbank Swedbank-Invest. At the time of delivery of the material in the print press office Swedbank has not responded to the request.
At the same time high-ranking source in the National Bank assured that Swedbank has sufficient regulatory capital and does not violate the norm of capital adequacy (H2). He said financial institution built up charter fund and raised a subordinated loan. In May 2009 already rumors that Swedbank intends to sell its Ukrainian “daughter” and talks about it with the EBRD. However, later the press office Swedbank denied this information. And in August 2009 has information on the intention of the owners to increase the authorized capital of Swedbank on 5 mlrd grn. If the period of active growth of foreign owners of capital built up to race their creations for the expansion of active operations, they are now forced to offset losses from defaults on loans issued inadvertently.
fairness it should be noted that while the foreign banking groups to provide sufficient support for its Ukrainian unit. This is evidenced by the facts. First, banks with foreign capital experienced the peak of the crisis, almost without having to refinance the NBU. Secondly, while none of the foreign bank is not bankrupt, while more than 20 local players were handed over to the temporary administration of NBU. However, there are cases where because of the crisis, foreigners were forced to turn off the banking business in Ukraine. Thus, the Netherlands ING Bank in early 2009 eliminated the retail division in Ukraine.
Remains sweet
   ÂÂ
In early 2009, representatives of some foreign banks” stated intention to buy fallen in price because of the crisis, domestic financial institution. However, this did not happen. Following in 2009 can be identified only completion of the transaction on purchase Prominvestbanka Russia Vneshekonombank. As a result, Russia”s capital secured a dominant position in the domestic banking sector to foreign financial establishments. Over 25% of foreign investment in the Ukrainian banking system are the origin of Russia.
However, it is worth noting a number of specific transactions. As is known, during the boom of mergers, acquisitions, some Ukrainian owners of the banks did not sell their offspring to foreigners completely, leaving under his control a substantial interest. For example, in 2006, businessmen Ernest Galiev and Alexander Yaroslavsky sold the French BNP Paribas shares only 51% of UkrSibbank.
This ownership structure was maintained for three years. In early 2009 it became necessary to replenish the capital next UkrSibbank. However, Mr. Galiev did not want to make money. In June, he sold his portion of the shares in the amount of 24,5% majority shareholder. The amount of the transaction were not disclosed. Thus, after the capital increase the share of BNP Paribas in UkrSibbank reached 81,4%, the share of Alexander Yaroslavsky - 18,6%. A similar situation in the bank “Forum”, 63% owned by German Commerzbank. The owner 26% of shares of bank “Forum” is Leonid Yurushev.
For almost half a year shareholders can not increase a bank”s charter capital to 1.1 billion UAH. “The next meeting of shareholders scheduled for March. The negotiations between the shareholders are, what they will end - it is a question for shareholders. As long as capital is enough - we have the norm of capital adequacy of H2 is 16% (at the standard rate of 10%. - Auth.)”, - Noted Yaroslav Kolesnik, chairman of the bank “Forum”. According to the Business, Mr. Yurushev and representatives Commerzbanka can not agree on the price of shares.
   ÂÂ
There are also examples where the Ukrainian majority owners are forced to transfer control of the bank to its foreign partners. So, in January 2010, “VAB Bank announced that the Netherlands holding TBIF Financial Services NV intends to concentrate 98% of its shares. According to NBU, even at 1 October 2009 51% of “VAB Bank belonged to the family of businessman Sergei Maximov. Read the rest of this entry »